One of the 3 criteria in the German doctrine of equivalence is that the considerations of the person skilled in the art when finding a replacement for the feature of a claim "orient themselves on the teaching of the patent claim".
It is not surprising that this criterion gives rise to discussions as to what it actually means.
The decision 15 U 139/14 "Heizkessel mit Brenner" of the Düsseldorf Upper District Court (OLG Düsseldorf) relates to an appeal against the rejection of a request for preliminary injunction and contains a translation of the criterion into a more handy language. According to the Court, the technical teaching given the patent has to be accepted as justified and may not be questioned in its technical legitimacy upon searching a replacement means with the same technical effect.
No comments:
Post a Comment